From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Background writeback are easily livelockable (from a definition of their target). This is inconvenient because it can make sync(1) stall forever waiting on its queued work to be finished. Generally, when a flusher thread has some work queued, someone submitted the work to achieve a goal more specific than what background writeback does. So it makes sense to give it a priority over a generic page cleaning. Thus we interrupt background writeback if there is some other work to do. We return to the background writeback after completing all the queued work. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> --- fs/fs-writeback.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) --- linux-next.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2010-11-01 19:50:22.000000000 +0800 +++ linux-next/fs/fs-writeback.c 2010-11-01 19:56:54.000000000 +0800 @@ -664,6 +664,15 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writ break; /* + * Background writeout and kupdate-style writeback are + * easily livelockable. Stop them if there is other work + * to do so that e.g. sync can proceed. + */ + if ((work->for_background || work->for_kupdate) && + !list_empty(&wb->bdi->work_list)) + break; + + /* * For background writeout, stop when we are below the * background dirty threshold */ -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>