On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:48:38AM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> I think I found a right trace. Following one-liner fixes the issue
> beginning from v4.2-rc1 up to v4.4 included:
>
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static inline bool
> early_page_uninitialised(unsigned long pfn)
>
> static inline bool early_page_nid_uninitialised(unsigned long pfn, int nid)
> {
> - return false;
> + return true;
> }
>
How does that make a difference in v4.4 since commit
974a786e63c96a2401a78ddba926f34c128474f1 removed the only
early_page_nid_uninitialised() ? It further doesn't make sense if deferred
memory initialisation is not enabled as the pages will always be
initialised.
> From what I understood, now order-0 allocation keep no reserve at all.
Watermarks should still be preserved. zone_watermark_ok is still there.
What might change is the size of reserves for high-order atomic
allocations only. Fragmentation shouldn't be a factor. I'm missing some
major part of the picture.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>