On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:11:42AM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > > I'm half tempted at this point to mostly ignore this mm/ behavour > > because we are moving down the path of removing buffer heads from > > XFS. That will require us to do different things in ->releasepage > > and so just skipping dirty pages in the XFS code is the best thing > > to do.... > > does this change anything i should test? Or is 4.6 still the way to go? Doesn't matter now - the warning will still be there on 4.6. I think you can simply ignore it as the XFS code appears to be handling the dirty page that is being passed to it correctly. We'll work out what needs to be done to get rid of the warning for this case, wether it be a mm/ change or an XFS change. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>