On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 23:30 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > Looking only at slab_reclaimable I had the impression there _could_ > have been plenty of memory that could be reclaimed. Just wondering :) Yeah, something funky is probably going on. But, the "reclaimable" ones aren't guaranteed to be reclaimable. It just means that we can usually reclaim most of them. If you have a refcount leak on an object or something like that, they're effectively unreclaimable still. So, either way, the next step is to see which slab it was that blew up. -- Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>