Hello, Can you please test whether this patch resolves the issue? While adding support for atomic allocations, I reduced alloc_mutex covered region too much. Thanks. diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c index 0c59684..bd2df70 100644 --- a/mm/percpu.c +++ b/mm/percpu.c @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static struct pcpu_chunk *pcpu_reserved_chunk; static int pcpu_reserved_chunk_limit; static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pcpu_lock); /* all internal data structures */ -static DEFINE_MUTEX(pcpu_alloc_mutex); /* chunk create/destroy, [de]pop */ +static DEFINE_MUTEX(pcpu_alloc_mutex); /* chunk create/destroy, [de]pop, map extension */ static struct list_head *pcpu_slot __read_mostly; /* chunk list slots */ @@ -435,6 +435,8 @@ static int pcpu_extend_area_map(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk, int new_alloc) size_t old_size = 0, new_size = new_alloc * sizeof(new[0]); unsigned long flags; + lockdep_assert_held(&pcpu_alloc_mutex); + new = pcpu_mem_zalloc(new_size); if (!new) return -ENOMEM; @@ -895,6 +897,9 @@ static void __percpu *pcpu_alloc(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved, return NULL; } + if (!is_atomic) + mutex_lock(&pcpu_alloc_mutex); + spin_lock_irqsave(&pcpu_lock, flags); /* serve reserved allocations from the reserved chunk if available */ @@ -967,12 +972,11 @@ static void __percpu *pcpu_alloc(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved, if (is_atomic) goto fail; - mutex_lock(&pcpu_alloc_mutex); + lockdep_assert_held(&pcpu_alloc_mutex); if (list_empty(&pcpu_slot[pcpu_nr_slots - 1])) { chunk = pcpu_create_chunk(); if (!chunk) { - mutex_unlock(&pcpu_alloc_mutex); err = "failed to allocate new chunk"; goto fail; } @@ -983,7 +987,6 @@ static void __percpu *pcpu_alloc(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved, spin_lock_irqsave(&pcpu_lock, flags); } - mutex_unlock(&pcpu_alloc_mutex); goto restart; area_found: @@ -993,8 +996,6 @@ static void __percpu *pcpu_alloc(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved, if (!is_atomic) { int page_start, page_end, rs, re; - mutex_lock(&pcpu_alloc_mutex); - page_start = PFN_DOWN(off); page_end = PFN_UP(off + size); @@ -1005,7 +1006,6 @@ static void __percpu *pcpu_alloc(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved, spin_lock_irqsave(&pcpu_lock, flags); if (ret) { - mutex_unlock(&pcpu_alloc_mutex); pcpu_free_area(chunk, off, &occ_pages); err = "failed to populate"; goto fail_unlock; @@ -1045,6 +1045,8 @@ static void __percpu *pcpu_alloc(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved, /* see the flag handling in pcpu_blance_workfn() */ pcpu_atomic_alloc_failed = true; pcpu_schedule_balance_work(); + } else { + mutex_unlock(&pcpu_alloc_mutex); } return NULL; } @@ -1137,6 +1139,8 @@ static void pcpu_balance_workfn(struct work_struct *work) list_for_each_entry_safe(chunk, next, &to_free, list) { int rs, re; + cancel_work_sync(&chunk->map_extend_work); + pcpu_for_each_pop_region(chunk, rs, re, 0, pcpu_unit_pages) { pcpu_depopulate_chunk(chunk, rs, re); spin_lock_irq(&pcpu_lock); -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>