On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:09:14 -0700 Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If the current process is in a non-root memcg, then > balance_dirty_pages() will consider the memcg dirty limits > as well as the system-wide limits. This allows different > cgroups to have distinct dirty limits which trigger direct > and background writeback at different levels. > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Ideally, I think some comments in the code for "why we need double-check system's dirty limit and memcg's dirty limit" will be appreciated. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>