* Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Should print on success: > [root@localhost ~]# ./test_mremap_vdso_32 > AT_SYSINFO_EHDR is 0xf773f000 > [NOTE] Moving vDSO: [f773f000, f7740000] -> [a000000, a001000] > [OK] > Or segfault if landing was bad (before patches): > [root@localhost ~]# ./test_mremap_vdso_32 > AT_SYSINFO_EHDR is 0xf774f000 > [NOTE] Moving vDSO: [f774f000, f7750000] -> [a000000, a001000] > Segmentation fault (core dumped) So I still think that generating potential segfaults is not a proper way to test a new feature. How are we supposed to tell the feature still works? I realize that glibc is a problem here - but that doesn't really change the QA equation: we are adding new kernel code to help essentially a single application out of tens of thousands of applications. At minimum we should have a robust testcase ... Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>