On 05/17/16 19:35, Li Peng wrote: > Signed-off-by: Li Peng <lip@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +- > mm/page_alloc.c | 6 +++--- > mm/vmscan.c | 7 +++---- > mm/zswap.c | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > index 142cb61..8ff5a79 100644 > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -3267,8 +3267,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx) > /* > * There should be no need to raise the scanning > * priority if enough pages are already being scanned > - * that that high watermark would be met at 100% > - * efficiency. > + * that high watermark would be met at 100% efficiency. I think that this one wasn't wrong, just confusing. Maybe change it to: * that the high watermark would be met at 100% efficiency. > */ > if (kswapd_shrink_zone(zone, end_zone, &sc)) > raise_priority = false; > diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c > index de0f119b..6d829d7 100644 > --- a/mm/zswap.c > +++ b/mm/zswap.c > @@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ static int zswap_writeback_entry(struct zpool *pool, unsigned long handle) > * a load may happening concurrently > * it is safe and okay to not free the entry > * if we free the entry in the following put > - * it it either okay to return !0 > + * it either okay to return !0 That's still confusing. Needs some kind of help. > */ > fail: > spin_lock(&tree->lock); > -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>