Re: [RFC 11/13] mm, compaction: add the ultimate direct compaction priority

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/16/2016 09:17 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>Wouldn't it be better to pull the prio check into compaction_deferred
>directly? There are more callers and I am not really sure all of them
>would behave consistently.
I'll check, thanks.

Hm so the other callers of compaction_deferred() are in the context where there's no direct compaction priority set. They would have to pass something like DEF_COMPACT_PRIORITY. That starts getting subtle so I'd rather not go that way.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]