On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05:17:23PM +0530, Ashish Srivastava wrote: > > Test-case for that would be helpful, as normal malloc()'ed anon memory > > cannot be subject for the bug. Unless I miss something obvious. > > I've modified the test-case attached to the bug and now it doesn't use > malloc()'ed memory but file backed mmap shared memory. Yes, that's consistent with your analysis. You can post the patch with my Acked-by. -- Kirill A. Shutemov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>