thank you very much! Vlastimil.
At 2016-05-17 13:14:42, "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote: >On 05/17/2016 03:06 AM, Wang Xiaoqiang wrote: >>>yes it would. Why that would matter. The checks should be in an order >>>which could give us a more specific reason with later checks. bad_page() >> >> I see, you mean the later "bad_reason" is the superset of the previous one. > >Not exactly. It's not possible to sort all the reasons like that. But as >Michal said, bad_page() will print all the relevant info so you can >reconstruct all reasons from it. The bad_reason text is mostly a hint >what to check first. > >>>will then print more detailed information. >>>-- >>>Michal Hocko >>>SUSE Labs >> >> thank you, Michal.