On Mon, 2 May 2016 20:03:07 +0200 Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 07:00:42PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > Agreed. I just didn't see the two-refcounts solution. > > If you didn't do it already or if you're busy with something else, > I can change the patch to the two refcount solution, which should > restore the old semantics without breaking rmap. I didn't see any follow-up beyond this nor patches on lkml. Do we have something we feel confident for posting to v4.6 with a stable backport to v4.5? Thanks, Alex -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>