Re: [resend][PATCH 3/4] move cred_guard_mutex from task_struct to signal_struct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

> > Except: I am not sure about -stable. At least, this patch should
> > not go into the <2.6.35 kernels, it relies on misc changes which
> > changed the scope of task->signal. Before 2.6.35 almost any user
> > of ->cred_guard_mutex can race with exit and hit ->signal == NULL.
> 
> I see no justification for a change like this in any -stable tree.  It's
> just a cleanup, right?  If it's a prerequisite for the fix we like for an
> "important" bug, then that's a different story.  In its own right, it's
> clearly not appropriate for backporting.

Because [4/4] depend on [3/4] and I hope to backport it. Do you dislike it
too?


Thanks.



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]