On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:00:11PM -0700, Shi, Yang wrote: > Hi folks, > > I didn't realize pmd_* functions are protected by > CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE on the most architectures before I made this > change. > > Before I fix all the affected architectures code, I want to check if you > guys think this change is worth or not? > > Thanks, > Yang > > On 4/20/2016 11:24 AM, Yang Shi wrote: > >huge_pmd_set_accessed is only called by __handle_mm_fault from memory.c, > >move the definition to memory.c and make it static like create_huge_pmd and > >wp_huge_pmd. > > > >Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@xxxxxxxxxx> On pte side we have the same functionality open-coded. Should we do the same for pmd? Or change pte side the same way? -- Kirill A. Shutemov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>