Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: Always use STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 14:15 +1000, Balbir Singh wrote:
> 
> On 21/04/16 13:37, Michael Ellerman wrote:

> > Testing done by Paul Mackerras has shown that with a modern compiler
> > there is no negative effect on code generation from enabling
> > STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS.
> > 
> > So remove the option, and always use the strict type definitions.
> > 
> 
> Should we wait for Aneesh's patches before merging this in.

Preferably not.

I've already rebased his patches on top of this, it's trivial, it's just
removing code.

It also makes some things we might want to do as part of his series easier
(like adding a raw accessor to get the __be64 pmd/pte val).

cheers

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]