Hi Hugh,
On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Please replace the
> huge-tmpfs-try-to-allocate-huge-pages-split-into-a-team-fix.patch
> you added to your tree by this one: nothing wrong with Stephen's,
> but in this case I think the source is better off if we simply
> remove that BUILD_BUG() instead of adding an IS_ENABLED():
> fixes build problem seen on arm when putting together linux-next.
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/shmem.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -1744,7 +1744,6 @@ static inline struct page *shmem_hugetea
>
> static inline void shmem_disband_hugeteam(struct page *page)
> {
> - BUILD_BUG();
> }
>
> static inline void shmem_added_to_hugeteam(struct page *page,
I have replaced my fix with the above in today's linux-next.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>