The fair zone allocation policy is not without cost but it can be reduced
slightly. This patch removes an unnecessary local variable, checks the
likely conditions of the fair zone policy first, uses a bool instead of
a flags check and falls through when a remote node is encountered instead
of doing a full restart. The benefit is marginal but it's there
4.6.0-rc2 4.6.0-rc2
decstat-v1r20 optfair-v1r20
Min alloc-odr0-1 377.00 ( 0.00%) 380.00 ( -0.80%)
Min alloc-odr0-2 273.00 ( 0.00%) 273.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-4 226.00 ( 0.00%) 227.00 ( -0.44%)
Min alloc-odr0-8 196.00 ( 0.00%) 196.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-16 183.00 ( 0.00%) 183.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-32 175.00 ( 0.00%) 173.00 ( 1.14%)
Min alloc-odr0-64 172.00 ( 0.00%) 169.00 ( 1.74%)
Min alloc-odr0-128 170.00 ( 0.00%) 169.00 ( 0.59%)
Min alloc-odr0-256 183.00 ( 0.00%) 180.00 ( 1.64%)
Min alloc-odr0-512 191.00 ( 0.00%) 190.00 ( 0.52%)
Min alloc-odr0-1024 199.00 ( 0.00%) 198.00 ( 0.50%)
Min alloc-odr0-2048 204.00 ( 0.00%) 204.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-4096 210.00 ( 0.00%) 209.00 ( 0.48%)
Min alloc-odr0-8192 213.00 ( 0.00%) 213.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-16384 214.00 ( 0.00%) 214.00 ( 0.00%)
The benefit is marginal at best but one of the most important benefits,
avoiding a second search when falling back to another node is not triggered
by this particular test so the benefit for some corner cases is understated.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 7a5f6ff4ea06..98b443c97be6 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2676,12 +2676,10 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
{
struct zoneref *z;
struct zone *zone;
- bool fair_skipped;
- bool zonelist_rescan;
+ bool fair_skipped = false;
+ bool apply_fair = (alloc_flags & ALLOC_FAIR);
zonelist_scan:
- zonelist_rescan = false;
-
/*
* Scan zonelist, looking for a zone with enough free.
* See also __cpuset_node_allowed() comment in kernel/cpuset.c.
@@ -2701,13 +2699,16 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
* page was allocated in should have no effect on the
* time the page has in memory before being reclaimed.
*/
- if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_FAIR) {
- if (!zone_local(ac->preferred_zone, zone))
- break;
+ if (apply_fair) {
if (test_bit(ZONE_FAIR_DEPLETED, &zone->flags)) {
fair_skipped = true;
continue;
}
+ if (!zone_local(ac->preferred_zone, zone)) {
+ if (fair_skipped)
+ goto reset_fair;
+ apply_fair = false;
+ }
}
/*
* When allocating a page cache page for writing, we
@@ -2796,18 +2797,13 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
* include remote zones now, before entering the slowpath and waking
* kswapd: prefer spilling to a remote zone over swapping locally.
*/
- if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_FAIR) {
- alloc_flags &= ~ALLOC_FAIR;
- if (fair_skipped) {
- zonelist_rescan = true;
- reset_alloc_batches(ac->preferred_zone);
- }
- if (nr_online_nodes > 1)
- zonelist_rescan = true;
- }
-
- if (zonelist_rescan)
+ if (fair_skipped) {
+reset_fair:
+ apply_fair = false;
+ fair_skipped = false;
+ reset_alloc_batches(ac->preferred_zone);
goto zonelist_scan;
+ }
return NULL;
}
--
2.6.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>