On 04/09/16 at 10:26am, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 11:29:18AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > > If this is _forwarding only_ it maybe useful to look at > > Alexey's old code in particular the DMA bits; > > he built his own lookup algorithm but sounds like bpf is > > a much better fit today. > > a link to these old bits? > > Just to be clear: this rfc is not the only thing we're considering. > In particular huawei guys did a monster effort to improve performance > in this area as well. We'll try to blend all the code together and > pick what's the best. What's the plan on opening the discussion on this? Can we get a peek? Is it an alternative to XDP and the driver hook? Different architecture or just different implementation? I understood it as another pseudo skb model with a path on converting to real skbs for stack processing. I really like the current proposal by Brenden for its simplicity and targeted compatibility with cls_bpf. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>