These identifiers are bogus. The interested architectures should define
HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS whenever relevant to do so. If this
isn't true for some arch, it should be fixed in the arch definition.
Signed-off-by: Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@xxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/lz4/lz4defs.h | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h b/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h
index 0710a62..c79d7ea 100644
--- a/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h
+++ b/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h
@@ -24,9 +24,7 @@
typedef struct _U16_S { u16 v; } U16_S;
typedef struct _U32_S { u32 v; } U32_S;
typedef struct _U64_S { u64 v; } U64_S;
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) \
- || defined(CONFIG_ARM) && __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6 \
- && defined(ARM_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
+#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
#define A16(x) (((U16_S *)(x))->v)
#define A32(x) (((U32_S *)(x))->v)
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>