On Wed 23-03-16 17:37:18, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > Current code fails to ignore the 'hugepages=' parameters when unsupported > hugepagesize is specified. With this patchset, introduce new architecture > independent routine hugetlb_bad_size to handle such command line options. > And then call it in architecture specific code. > > Changes since v1: > - Separated different architecture specific changes in different > patches > - CC'ed all arch maintainers The hugetlb parameters parsing is a bit mess but this at least makes it behave more consistently. Feel free to add to all patches Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> On a side note. I have received patches with broken threading - the follow up patches are not in the single thread under this cover email. I thought this was the default behavior of git send-email but maybe your (older) version doesn't do that. --thread option would enforce that (with --no-chain-reply-to) or you can set it up in the git config. IMHO it is always better to have the patchset in the single email thread. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>