Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> [ text/plain ]
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:22:23PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > [ text/plain ]
>> > This patch add helper for device page fault. Thus helpers will fill
>> > the mirror page table using the CPU page table and synchronizing
>> > with any update to CPU page table.
>> >
>> > Changed since v1:
>> > - Add comment about directory lock.
>> >
>> > Changed since v2:
>> > - Check for mirror->hmm in hmm_mirror_fault()
>> >
>> > Changed since v3:
>> > - Adapt to HMM page table changes.
>> >
>> > Changed since v4:
>> > - Fix PROT_NONE, ie do not populate from protnone pte.
>> > - Fix huge pmd handling (start address may != pmd start address)
>> > - Fix missing entry case.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Sherry Cheung <SCheung@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Subhash Gutti <sgutti@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Jatin Kumar <jakumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>>
>>
>> ....
>> ....
>>
>> +static int hmm_mirror_fault_hpmd(struct hmm_mirror *mirror,
>> > + struct hmm_event *event,
>> > + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> > + struct hmm_pt_iter *iter,
>> > + pmd_t *pmdp,
>> > + struct hmm_mirror_fault *mirror_fault,
>> > + unsigned long start,
>> > + unsigned long end)
>> > +{
>> > + struct page *page;
>> > + unsigned long addr, pfn;
>> > + unsigned flags = FOLL_TOUCH;
>> > + spinlock_t *ptl;
>> > + int ret;
>> > +
>> > + ptl = pmd_lock(mirror->hmm->mm, pmdp);
>> > + if (unlikely(!pmd_trans_huge(*pmdp))) {
>> > + spin_unlock(ptl);
>> > + return -EAGAIN;
>> > + }
>> > + flags |= event->etype == HMM_DEVICE_WFAULT ? FOLL_WRITE : 0;
>> > + page = follow_trans_huge_pmd(vma, start, pmdp, flags);
>> > + pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>> > + spin_unlock(ptl);
>> > +
>> > + /* Just fault in the whole PMD. */
>> > + start &= PMD_MASK;
>> > + end = start + PMD_SIZE - 1;
>> > +
>> > + if (!pmd_write(*pmdp) && event->etype == HMM_DEVICE_WFAULT)
>> > + return -ENOENT;
>> > +
>> > + for (ret = 0, addr = start; !ret && addr < end;) {
>> > + unsigned long i, next = end;
>> > + dma_addr_t *hmm_pte;
>> > +
>> > + hmm_pte = hmm_pt_iter_populate(iter, addr, &next);
>> > + if (!hmm_pte)
>> > + return -ENOMEM;
>> > +
>> > + i = hmm_pt_index(&mirror->pt, addr, mirror->pt.llevel);
>> > +
>> > + /*
>> > + * The directory lock protect against concurrent clearing of
>> > + * page table bit flags. Exceptions being the dirty bit and
>> > + * the device driver private flags.
>> > + */
>> > + hmm_pt_iter_directory_lock(iter);
>> > + do {
>> > + if (!hmm_pte_test_valid_pfn(&hmm_pte[i])) {
>> > + hmm_pte[i] = hmm_pte_from_pfn(pfn);
>> > + hmm_pt_iter_directory_ref(iter);
>>
>> I looked at that and it is actually
>> static inline void hmm_pt_iter_directory_ref(struct hmm_pt_iter *iter)
>> {
>> BUG_ON(!iter->ptd[iter->pt->llevel - 1]);
>> hmm_pt_directory_ref(iter->pt, iter->ptd[iter->pt->llevel - 1]);
>> }
>>
>> static inline void hmm_pt_directory_ref(struct hmm_pt *pt,
>> struct page *ptd)
>> {
>> if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&ptd->_mapcount))
>> /* Illegal this should not happen. */
>> BUG();
>> }
>>
>> what is the mapcount update about ?
>
> Unlike regular CPU page table we do not rely on unmap to prune HMM mirror
> page table. Rather we free/prune it aggressively once the device no longer
> have anything mirror in a given range.
Which patch does this ?
>
> As such mapcount is use to keep track of any many valid entry there is per
> directory.
>
> Moreover mapcount is also use to protect from concurrent pruning when
> you walk through the page table you increment refcount by one along your
> way. When you done walking you decrement refcount.
>
> Because of that last aspect, the mapcount can never reach zero because we
> unmap page, it can only reach zero once we cleanup the page table walk.
>
>>
>> > + }
>> > + BUG_ON(hmm_pte_pfn(hmm_pte[i]) != pfn);
>> > + if (pmd_write(*pmdp))
>> > + hmm_pte_set_write(&hmm_pte[i]);
>> > + } while (addr += PAGE_SIZE, pfn++, i++, addr != next);
>> > + hmm_pt_iter_directory_unlock(iter);
>> > + mirror_fault->addr = addr;
>> > + }
>> > +
>>
>> So we don't have huge page mapping in hmm page table ?
>
> No we don't right now. First reason is that i wanted to keep things simple for
> device driver. Second motivation is to keep first patchset simpler especialy
> the page migration code.
>
> Memory overhead is 2MB per GB of virtual memory mirrored. There is no TLB here.
> I believe adding huge page can be done as part of a latter patchset if it makes
> sense.
>
One of the thing I am wondering is can we do the patch series in such a
way that we move the page table mirror to device driver. That is an
hmm fault will look at cpu page table and call into a device driver callback
with the pte entry details. It is upto the device driver to maintain a
mirror table if needed. Similarly for cpu fault we call into hmm
callback to find per pte dma_addr and do a migrate using
copy_from_device callback. I haven't fully looked at how easy this would
be, but I guess lot of the code in this series got to do with mirror
table and I wondering is there a simpler version we can get upstream
that hides it within a driver.
Also does it simply to have interfaces that operates on one pte than an
array of ptes ?
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href