On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 22:23 -0500, pacman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > The diff fragment above applied inside prom_close_stdin, but there are > some > prom_printf calls after prom_close_stdin. Calling prom_printf after > closing > stdout sounds like it could be bad. If I moved it down below all the > prom_printf's, it would be after the "quiesce" call. Would that be > acceptable > (or even interesting as an experiment)? Does a close need a quiesce > after it? Just try :-) "quiesce" is something that afaik only apple ever implemented anyways. It uses hooks inside their OF to shut down all drivers that do bus master (among other HW sanitization tasks). Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>