On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:11:09 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > > index 14ee899..222d8cc 100644 > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ > > #include <linux/kmemleak.h> > > #include <linux/memory.h> > > #include <linux/compaction.h> > > +#include <linux/vmstat.h> > > #include <trace/events/kmem.h> > > #include <linux/ftrace_event.h> > > > > @@ -5013,6 +5014,8 @@ int __meminit init_per_zone_wmark_min(void) > > min_free_kbytes = 128; > > if (min_free_kbytes > 65536) > > min_free_kbytes = 65536; > > + > > + refresh_zone_stat_thresholds(); > > setup_per_zone_wmarks(); > > setup_per_zone_lowmem_reserve(); > > setup_per_zone_inactive_ratio(); > > setup_per_zone_wmarks() could change the min and low watermarks for a zone > when refresh_zone_stat_thresholds() would have used the old value. Indeed. I could make the obvious fix, but then what I'd have wouldn't be sufficiently tested. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>