On 03/08/2016 02:42 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> > > compaction code is doing weird dances between > COMPACT_FOO -> int -> unsigned long > > but there doesn't seem to be any reason for that. All functions which I vaguely recall trying this once and running into header dependency hell. But maybe it was something a bit different and involved storing a value in struct compact_control. > return/use one of those constants are not expecting any other value > so it really makes sense to define an enum for them and make it clear > that no other values are expected. > > This is a pure cleanup and shouldn't introduce any functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>