On 03/07/2016 04:16 PM, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
On 2016/3/7 12:34, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 03:35:26PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2016/3/4 14:38, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:05:09PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2016/3/4 12:32, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 11:02:33AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:49:01PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2016/3/3 15:42, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
2016-03-03 10:25 GMT+09:00 Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>:
(cc -mm and Joonsoo Kim)
On 03/02/2016 05:52 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
Hi,
I came across a suspicious error for CMA stress test:
Before the test, I got:
-bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo | grep Cma
CmaTotal: 204800 kB
CmaFree: 195044 kB
After running the test:
-bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo | grep Cma
CmaTotal: 204800 kB
CmaFree: 6602584 kB
So the freed CMA memory is more than total..
Also the the MemFree is more than mem total:
-bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 16342016 kB
MemFree: 22367268 kB
MemAvailable: 22370528 kB
[...]
I played with this a bit and can see the same problem. The sanity
check of CmaFree < CmaTotal generally triggers in
__move_zone_freepage_state in unset_migratetype_isolate.
This also seems to be present as far back as v4.0 which was the
first version to have the updated accounting from Joonsoo.
Were there known limitations with the new freepage accounting,
Joonsoo?
I don't know. I also played with this and looks like there is
accounting problem, however, for my case, number of free page is slightly less
than total. I will take a look.
Hanjun, could you tell me your malloc_size? I tested with 1 and it doesn't
look like your case.
I tested with malloc_size with 2M, and it grows much bigger than 1M, also I
did some other test:
Thanks! Now, I can re-generate erronous situation you mentioned.
- run with single thread with 100000 times, everything is fine.
- I hack the cam_alloc() and free as below [1] to see if it's lock issue, with
the same test with 100 multi-thread, then I got:
[1] would not be sufficient to close this race.
Try following things [A]. And, for more accurate test, I changed code a bit more
to prevent kernel page allocation from cma area [B]. This will prevent kernel
page allocation from cma area completely so we can focus cma_alloc/release race.
Although, this is not correct fix, it could help that we can guess
where the problem is.
More correct fix is something like below.
Please test it.
Hmm, this is not working:
Sad to hear that.
Could you tell me your system's MAX_ORDER and pageblock_order?
MAX_ORDER is 11, pageblock_order is 9, thanks for your help!
Hmm... that's same with me.
Below is similar fix that prevents buddy merging when one of buddy's
migrate type, but, not both, is MIGRATE_ISOLATE. In fact, I have
no idea why previous fix (more correct fix) doesn't work for you.
(It works for me.) But, maybe there is a bug on the fix
so I make new one which is more general form. Please test it.
Hi,
Hanjun Guo has gone to Tailand on business, so I help him to run this patch. The result
shows that the count of "CmaFree:" is OK now.
Thanks Leizhen :)
But sometimes printed some information as below:
alloc_contig_range: [28500, 28600) PFNs busy
alloc_contig_range: [28300, 28380) PFNs busy
I think it's not a problem for the stress test, as it's
the lock not released yet.
Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>