On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:55:17 +0800 Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Andrew Morton
> >>
> >> Also, a slightly better implementation would be
> >>
> >> static inline void * vmalloc_node_flags(unsigned long size, gfp_t flags)
> >> {
> >> return vmalloc_node(size, 1, flags, PAGE_KERNEL, -1,
> >> builtin_return_address(0));
> >> }
>
> Is this better? might vmalloc_node_flags would be used by other than vmalloc?
>
> static inline void * vmalloc_node_flags(unsigned long size, int node,
> gfp_t flags)
I have no strong opinions, really. If we add more and more arguments
to vmalloc_node_flags() it ends up looking like vmalloc_node(), so we
may as well just call vmalloc_node(). Do whatever feels good ;)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>