On (02/22/16 13:54), Minchan Kim wrote: [..] > > well, at the same time zram must not dictate what to do. zram simply spoils > > zsmalloc; it does not offer guaranteed good compression, and it does not let > > zsmalloc to do it's job. zram has only excuses to be the way it is. > > the existing zram->zsmalloc dependency looks worse than zsmalloc->zram to me. > > I don't get it why you think it's zram->zsmalloc dependency. clearly 'dependency' was simply a wrong word to use, 'enforcement' or 'policy' are better choices here. but you got my point. -ss -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>