Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] mm, kasan: SLAB support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ah, yes, I see.
This patch was indeed missing the following bits in kasan_slab_free():

#ifdef CONFIG_SLAB
 if (cache->flags & SLAB_KASAN) {
 struct kasan_free_meta *free_info =
 get_free_info(cache, object);
 struct kasan_alloc_meta *alloc_info =
 get_alloc_info(cache, object);
 alloc_info->state = KASAN_STATE_FREE;
 set_track(&free_info->track);
 }
#endif

I'll include them in the next round of patches.

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:15 AM, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:29:42PM +0100, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > On Jan 28, 2016 8:44 AM, "Joonsoo Kim" <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 07:25:07PM +0100, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>>>> >> > This patch adds KASAN hooks to SLAB allocator.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > This patch is based on the "mm: kasan: unified support for SLUB and
>>>> >> > SLAB allocators" patch originally prepared by Dmitry Chernenkov.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> >> > ---
>>>> >> >  Documentation/kasan.txt  |  5 ++-
>>>> >>
>>>> >> ...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SLAB
>>>> >> > +struct kasan_alloc_meta *get_alloc_info(struct kmem_cache *cache,
>>>> >> > +                                     const void *object)
>>>> >> > +{
>>>> >> > +     return (void *)object + cache->kasan_info.alloc_meta_offset;
>>>> >> > +}
>>>> >> > +
>>>> >> > +struct kasan_free_meta *get_free_info(struct kmem_cache *cache,
>>>> >> > +                                   const void *object)
>>>> >> > +{
>>>> >> > +     return (void *)object + cache->kasan_info.free_meta_offset;
>>>> >> > +}
>>>> >> > +#endif
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I cannot find the place to store stack info for free. get_free_info()
>>>> >> isn't used except print_object(). Plese let me know where.
>>>> >
>>>> > This is covered by other patches in this patchset.
>>>
>>> This should be covered by this patch. Stroing and printing free_info
>>> is already done on SLUB and it is meaningful without quarantain.
>
> 2016-02-18 21:58 GMT+09:00 Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> However this info is meaningless without saved stack traces, which are
>> only introduced in the stackdepot patch (see "[PATCH v1 5/8] mm,
>> kasan: Stackdepot implementation. Enable stackdepot for SLAB")
>
> Not meaningless. You already did it for allocation caller without saved
> stack traces. What makes difference between alloc/free?
>
> Thanks.



-- 
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer

Google Germany GmbH
Erika-Mann-Straße, 33
80636 München

Geschäftsführer: Matthew Scott Sucherman, Paul Terence Manicle
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind,
leiten Sie diese bitte nicht weiter, informieren Sie den
Absender und löschen Sie die E-Mail und alle Anhänge. Vielen Dank.
This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the right addressee please
do not forward it, please inform the sender, and please erase this
e-mail including any attachments. Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]