Re: [PATCH V2 07/29] mm: Make vm_get_page_prot arch specific.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 02:50:19PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> With next generation power processor, we are having a new mmu model
> [1] that require us to maintain a different linux page table format.
> 
> Inorder to support both current and future ppc64 systems with a single
> kernel we need to make sure kernel can select between different page
> table format at runtime. With the new MMU (radix MMU) added, we will
> have to dynamically switch between different protection map. Hence
> override vm_get_page_prot instead of using arch_vm_get_page_prot. We
> also drop arch_vm_get_page_prot since only powerpc used it.

What's different about ISA v3.0 that means that the protection_map[]
entries need to be different?

If it's just different bit assignments for things like _PAGE_READ
etc., couldn't we fix this up at early boot time by writing new values
into protection_map[]?  Is there a reason why that wouldn't work, or
why you don't want to do that?

Paul.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]