On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 08:16:52PM +0300, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
...
> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> index 6ecc697..41176dd 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -2414,13 +2414,19 @@ int __kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *cachep, bool deactivate)
>
> int __kmem_cache_shutdown(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
> {
> - int i;
> - struct kmem_cache_node *n;
> int rc = __kmem_cache_shrink(cachep, false);
>
> if (rc)
> return rc;
Nit:
int __kmem_cache_shutdown(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
{
- int rc = __kmem_cache_shrink(cachep, false);
-
- if (rc)
- return rc;
-
- return 0;
+ return __kmem_cache_shrink(cachep, false);
}
>
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void __kmem_cache_release(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct kmem_cache_node *n;
> +
> free_percpu(cachep->cpu_cache);
>
> /* NUMA: free the node structures */
> @@ -2430,7 +2436,6 @@ int __kmem_cache_shutdown(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
> kfree(n);
> cachep->node[i] = NULL;
> }
> - return 0;
> }
>
> /*
You seem to forget to replace __kmem_cache_shutdown with
__kmem_cache_release in __kmem_cache_create error path:
@@ -2168,7 +2168,7 @@ done:
err = setup_cpu_cache(cachep, gfp);
if (err) {
- __kmem_cache_shutdown(cachep);
+ __kmem_cache_release(cachep);
return err;
}
...
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 2e1355a..ce21ce2 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -3173,11 +3173,12 @@ static void early_kmem_cache_node_alloc(int node)
> __add_partial(n, page, DEACTIVATE_TO_HEAD);
> }
>
> -static void free_kmem_cache_nodes(struct kmem_cache *s)
> +void __kmem_cache_release(struct kmem_cache *s)
> {
> int node;
> struct kmem_cache_node *n;
>
> + free_percpu(s->cpu_slab);
That's rather nit-picking, but this kinda disrupts
init_kmem_cache_nodes/free_kmem_cache_nodes symmetry.
I'd leave free_kmem_cache_nodes alone and make
__kmem_cache_release call it along with free_percpu.
This would also reduce the patch footprint, because
the two hunks below wouldn't be needed.
> for_each_kmem_cache_node(s, node, n) {
> kmem_cache_free(kmem_cache_node, n);
> s->node[node] = NULL;
> @@ -3199,7 +3200,7 @@ static int init_kmem_cache_nodes(struct kmem_cache *s)
> GFP_KERNEL, node);
>
> if (!n) {
> - free_kmem_cache_nodes(s);
> + __kmem_cache_release(s);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -3405,7 +3406,7 @@ static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_cache *s, unsigned long flags)
> if (alloc_kmem_cache_cpus(s))
> return 0;
>
> - free_kmem_cache_nodes(s);
> + __kmem_cache_release(s);
> error:
> if (flags & SLAB_PANIC)
> panic("Cannot create slab %s size=%lu realsize=%u "
> @@ -3443,7 +3444,7 @@ static void list_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
>
> /*
> * Attempt to free all partial slabs on a node.
> - * This is called from kmem_cache_close(). We must be the last thread
> + * This is called from __kmem_cache_shutdown(). We must be the last thread
> * using the cache and therefore we do not need to lock anymore.
Well, that's not true as we've found out - sysfs might still access the
cache in parallel. And alloc_calls_show -> list_locations does walk over
the kmem_cache_node->partial list, which we prune on shutdown.
I guess we should reintroduce locking for free_partial() in the scope of
this patch, partially reverting 69cb8e6b7c298.
> */
> static void free_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n)
> @@ -3456,7 +3457,7 @@ static void free_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n)
> discard_slab(s, page);
> } else {
> list_slab_objects(s, page,
> - "Objects remaining in %s on kmem_cache_close()");
> + "Objects remaining in %s on __kmem_cache_shutdown()");
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -3464,7 +3465,7 @@ static void free_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n)
> /*
> * Release all resources used by a slab cache.
> */
> -static inline int kmem_cache_close(struct kmem_cache *s)
> +int __kmem_cache_shutdown(struct kmem_cache *s)
> {
> int node;
> struct kmem_cache_node *n;
> @@ -3476,16 +3477,9 @@ static inline int kmem_cache_close(struct kmem_cache *s)
> if (n->nr_partial || slabs_node(s, node))
> return 1;
> }
> - free_percpu(s->cpu_slab);
> - free_kmem_cache_nodes(s);
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int __kmem_cache_shutdown(struct kmem_cache *s)
> -{
> - return kmem_cache_close(s);
> -}
> -
> /********************************************************************
> * Kmalloc subsystem
> *******************************************************************/
> @@ -3979,8 +3973,10 @@ int __kmem_cache_create(struct kmem_cache *s, unsigned long flags)
>
> memcg_propagate_slab_attrs(s);
> err = sysfs_slab_add(s);
> - if (err)
> - kmem_cache_close(s);
> + if (err) {
> + __kmem_cache_shutdown(s);
> + __kmem_cache_release(s);
> + }
No point calling __kmem_cache_shutdown on __kmem_cache_create error path
- the cache hasn't been used yet.
Thanks,
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>