On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 02:17:49PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 06:19:31PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Changing a page's memcg association complicates dealing with the page,
> > so we want to limit this as much as possible. Page migration e.g. does
> > not have to do that. Just like page cache replacement, it can forcibly
> > charge a replacement page, and then uncharge the old page when it gets
> > freed. Temporarily overcharging the cgroup by a single page is not an
> > issue in practice, and charging is so cheap nowadays that this is much
> > preferrable to the headache of messing with live pages.
> >
> > The only place that still changes the page->mem_cgroup binding of live
> > pages is when pages move along with a task to another cgroup. But that
> > path isolates the page from the LRU, takes the page lock, and the move
> > lock (lock_page_memcg()). That means page->mem_cgroup is always stable
> > in callers that have the page isolated from the LRU or locked. Lighter
> > unlocked paths, like writeback accounting, can use lock_page_memcg().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> [..]
> > @@ -372,12 +373,13 @@ int migrate_page_move_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
> > * Now we know that no one else is looking at the page:
> > * no turning back from here.
> > */
> > - set_page_memcg(newpage, page_memcg(page));
> > newpage->index = page->index;
> > newpage->mapping = page->mapping;
> > if (PageSwapBacked(page))
> > SetPageSwapBacked(newpage);
> >
> > + mem_cgroup_migrate(page, newpage);
> > +
> > get_page(newpage); /* add cache reference */
> > if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
> > SetPageSwapCache(newpage);
> > @@ -457,9 +459,11 @@ int migrate_huge_page_move_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
> > return -EAGAIN;
> > }
> >
> > - set_page_memcg(newpage, page_memcg(page));
> > newpage->index = page->index;
> > newpage->mapping = page->mapping;
> > +
> > + mem_cgroup_migrate(page, newpage);
> > +
> > get_page(newpage);
> >
> > radix_tree_replace_slot(pslot, newpage);
>
> I ran trinity on recent linux-next and got the lockdep splat below and if I
> read it right, this is the culprit. In particular, mem_cgroup_migrate was put
> in an area covered by spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock), but stuff it calls
> enables and disables interrupts on its own.
It must be safe to move these calls outside tree_lock:
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 307e95ece622..17db63b2dd36 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -379,8 +379,6 @@ int migrate_page_move_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
if (PageSwapBacked(page))
SetPageSwapBacked(newpage);
- mem_cgroup_migrate(page, newpage);
-
get_page(newpage); /* add cache reference */
if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
SetPageSwapCache(newpage);
@@ -430,6 +428,8 @@ int migrate_page_move_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
}
local_irq_enable();
+ mem_cgroup_migrate(page, newpage);
+
return MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS;
}
@@ -463,8 +463,6 @@ int migrate_huge_page_move_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
newpage->index = page->index;
newpage->mapping = page->mapping;
- mem_cgroup_migrate(page, newpage);
-
get_page(newpage);
radix_tree_replace_slot(pslot, newpage);
@@ -472,6 +470,9 @@ int migrate_huge_page_move_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
page_unfreeze_refs(page, expected_count - 1);
spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+
+ mem_cgroup_migrate(page, newpage);
+
return MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS;
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>