On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 03:10:19PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:19:53PM +1100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > We were a little sloppy about using PAGE_SIZE instead of PAGE_CACHE_SIZE. > > PAGE_CACHE_SIZE is non-sense. It never had any meaning. At least in > upstream. And only leads to confusion on border between vfs and mm. > > We should just drop it. > > I need to find time at some point to prepare patchset... I argued in favour of this at last LSFMM and people were ... reluctant. I think with your map_pages work, the PAGE_CACHE_SIZE idea now has no potential performance win left. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>