Re: [PATCH] HWPOISON: Implement hwpoison-on-free for soft offlining

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 On 10/12/2010 2:26 PM, Wu Fengguang wrote:


+#if defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE)&&  BITS_PER_LONG == 64
We have the simpler CONFIG_HWPOISON_ON_FREE :)


Leftover from when I didn't have that. Fixed.

+PAGEFLAG(HWPoisonOnFree, hwpoison_on_free)
+TESTSCFLAG(HWPoisonOnFree, hwpoison_on_free)
+#define __PG_HWPOISON_ON_FREE (1UL<<  PG_hwpoison_on_free)
+#else
+PAGEFLAG_FALSE(HWPoisonOnFree)
Could define SETPAGEFLAG_NOOP(HWPoisonOnFree) too, for eliminating an
#ifdef in the .c file.

Ok.


  	}
+
+	if (PageHWPoisonOnFree(page)) {
+		pr_info("soft_offline: %#lx: Delaying poision of unknown page %lx to free\n",
+			pfn, page->flags);
+		return -EIO; /* or 0? */
-EIO looks safer because HWPoisonOnFree does not guarantee success.

Ok.


diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index a8cfa9c..519c24c 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -564,6 +564,8 @@ static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page)
  		(page->mapping != NULL)  |
  		(atomic_read(&page->_count) != 0) |
  		(page->flags&  PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE))) {
+		if (PageHWPoisonOnFree(page))
+			hwpoison_page_on_free(page);
hwpoison_page_on_free() seems to be undefined when
CONFIG_HWPOISON_ON_FREE is not defined.

Yes, but I rely on the compiler never generating the call in this case because
the test is zero.

It would fail on a unoptimized build, but the kernel doesn't support that anyways.

Thanks for the review.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]