On 01/27/2016 05:48 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > >> >> Can you elaborate? Do we actually need an extendable linked array? Why not just >> store the pointer to the next free object into the object, NULL for the last >> one? I.e. a singly-linked list. We should never need to actually traverse it? >> >> freeing object obj: >> *obj = page->freelist; >> page->freelist = obj; >> >> allocating object: >> obj = page->freelist; >> page->freelist = *obj; >> *obj = NULL; > > Well the single linked lists are a concept of another slab allocator. At > what point do we rename SLAB to SLUB2? OK. Perhaps a LSF/MM topic then to discuss whether we need both? What are the remaining cases where SLAB is better choice, and can there be something done about them in SLUB? (I can imagine there were such discussions in the past, and I came to kernel development only in 2013. In that case maybe enough time passed to revisit this?) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>