Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/3] s390: query dynamic DEBUG_PAGEALLOC setting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Heiko Carstens wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:18:25AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > We can use debug_pagealloc_enabled() to check if we can map
> > the identity mapping with 1MB/2GB pages as well as to print
> > the current setting in dump_stack.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c |  4 +++-
> >  arch/s390/mm/vmem.c          | 10 ++++------
> >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c
> > index dc8e204..a1c0530 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/export.h>
> >  #include <linux/kdebug.h>
> >  #include <linux/ptrace.h>
> > +#include <linux/mm.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/sched.h>
> >  #include <asm/processor.h>
> > @@ -186,7 +187,8 @@ void die(struct pt_regs *regs, const char *str)
> >  	printk("SMP ");
> >  #endif
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> > -	printk("DEBUG_PAGEALLOC");
> > +	printk("DEBUG_PAGEALLOC(%s)",
> > +		debug_pagealloc_enabled() ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> >  #endif
> 
> I'd prefer if you change this to
> 
> 	if (debug_pagealloc_enabled())
> 		printk("DEBUG_PAGEALLOC");
> 
> That way we can get rid of yet another ifdef. Having
> "DEBUG_PAGEALLOC(disabled)" doesn't seem to be very helpful.
> 

I'd agree if CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC only did anything when 
debug_pagealloc_enabled() is true, but that doesn't seem to be the case.  
When CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is enabled, for instance, CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC 
also enables stackinfo storing and poisoning and it's not guarded by 
debug_pagealloc_enabled().

It seems like CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC enables debugging functionality 
outside the scope of the debug_pagealloc=on kernel parameter, so 
DEBUG_PAGEALLOC(disabled) actually does mean something.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]