(added "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx> to cc.)
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:38:50PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 09:46:21PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > Oh. Looks like a bug from 2013...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for report.
> > > > For unsigned int nr_pages, implicitly casted to long in
> > > > __mod_zone_page_state(), it becomes something around UINT_MAX.
> > > >
> > > > munlock_vma_page() usually called for THP as small pages go though
> > > > pagevec.
> > > >
> > > > Let's make nr_pages singed int.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Fixes: ff6a6da60b89 ("mm: accelerate munlock() treatment of THP pages")
> > > > Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > mm/mlock.c | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
> > > > index e1e2b1207bf2..96f001041928 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/mlock.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/mlock.c
> > > > @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static void __munlock_isolation_failed(struct page *page)
> > > > */
> > > > unsigned int munlock_vma_page(struct page *page)
> > > > {
> > > > - unsigned int nr_pages;
> > > > + int nr_pages;
> > > > struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> > > >
> > > > /* For try_to_munlock() and to serialize with page migration */
> > > > --
> > > > Kirill A. Shutemov
> > > >
>
> I tested your patch on Linux 4.4 and confirmed that your patch fixed this bug.
> Please also send to stable.
>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [4.4+]
>
> > > Don't we want to use "long" than "int" for all variables that count number
> > > of pages, for recently commit 6cdb18ad98a49f7e9b95d538a0614cde827404b8
> > > "mm/vmstat: fix overflow in mod_zone_page_state()" changed to use "long" ?
> >
> > Potentially, yes. But here we count number of small pages in the compound
> > page. We're far from being able to allocate 8 terabyte pages ;)
>
> That commit says "we have a 9TB system with only one node".
> You might encounter such machines in near future. ;-)
>
> >
> > Anyway, it's out-of-scope for this bug fix.
> >
> > My "Fixes:" is probably misleading, since we don't have bug visible until
> > 6cdb18ad98a4.
Please also mention 6cdb18ad98a4 in the changelog. I didn't request to add
my "obviously correct" ;) patch to be added to -stable.
But just in case somebody backports it..
There was also a performance regression reported that was introduced with
6cdb18ad98a4. However I couldn't make any sense of it. Maybe this patch
fixes it also?
See https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/5/1103
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>