Re: [PATCH v2] zsmalloc: fix migrate_zspage-zs_free race condition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On (01/16/16 08:44), Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 16.1.2016 5:09, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (01/15/16 16:49), Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > [..]
> >>
> >> Could you please also help making the changelog more clear?
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> +		free_obj |= BIT(HANDLE_PIN_BIT);
> >>>>  		record_obj(handle, free_obj);
> >>
> >> I think record_obj() should use WRITE_ONCE() or something like that.
> >> Otherwise the compiler is IMHO allowed to reorder this, i.e. first to assign
> >> free_obj to handle, and then add the PIN bit there.
> > 
> > good note.
> > 
> > ... or do both things in record_obj() (per Minchan)
> > 
> > 	record_obj(handle, obj)
> > 	{
> > 	        *(unsigned long)handle = obj & ~(1<<HANDLE_PIN_BIT);
> 
> Hmm but that's an unpin, not a pin? A mistake or I'm missing something?

I'm sure it's just a compose-in-mail-app typo.

	-ss

> Anyway the compiler can do the same thing here without a WRITE_ONCE().

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]