On (01/16/16 08:44), Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 16.1.2016 5:09, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (01/15/16 16:49), Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > [..]
> >>
> >> Could you please also help making the changelog more clear?
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> + free_obj |= BIT(HANDLE_PIN_BIT);
> >>>> record_obj(handle, free_obj);
> >>
> >> I think record_obj() should use WRITE_ONCE() or something like that.
> >> Otherwise the compiler is IMHO allowed to reorder this, i.e. first to assign
> >> free_obj to handle, and then add the PIN bit there.
> >
> > good note.
> >
> > ... or do both things in record_obj() (per Minchan)
> >
> > record_obj(handle, obj)
> > {
> > *(unsigned long)handle = obj & ~(1<<HANDLE_PIN_BIT);
>
> Hmm but that's an unpin, not a pin? A mistake or I'm missing something?
I'm sure it's just a compose-in-mail-app typo.
-ss
> Anyway the compiler can do the same thing here without a WRITE_ONCE().
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>