RE: [PATCH] bdi: use deferable timer for sync_supers task

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:35:14PM +0800, Yong Wang wrote:
> > sync_supers task currently wakes up periodically for superblock
> > writeback. This hurts power on battery driven devices. This patch
> > turns this housekeeping timer into a deferable timer so that it
> > does not fire when system is really idle.

> How long can the timer be defereed?  We can't simply stop writing
> out data for a long time.  I think the current timer value should be
> the upper bound, but allowing to fire earlier to run during the
> same wakeup cycle as others is fine.

If the system is in sleep state, this timer can be deferred to the next wake-up interrupt.
If the system is busy, this timer will fire at the scheduled time.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]