Re: What is oom_killer_disable() for?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 07:17:19 PM Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Michal Hocko write:

[cut]

> > I am not sure I am following you here but how do you detect that the
> > userspace has corrupted your image or accesses an already (half)
> > suspended device or something similar?
> 
> Can't we determine whether the OOM killer might have corrupted our image
> by checking whether oom_killer_disabled is kept true until the point of
> final decision?

The freezing is really not about keeping the image consistent etc.  It is
not about hibernation specifically even.

> To me, satisfying allocation requests by kernel threads by invoking the
> OOM killer and aborting suspend operation if the OOM killer was invoked
> sounds cleaner than forcing !__GFP_NOFAIL allocation requests to fail.

What if the suspend is on emergency, like low battery or thermal?

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]