On 01/11/2016 04:29 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:38:40 -0800 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 01/11/2016 02:35 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 14:37:04 -0800 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: <snip> >>>> The (unmodified) routine hugetlb_vmdelete_list was moved ahead of >>>> remove_inode_hugepages to satisfy the new reference. >>>> <snip> > > I'll mark this patch as "pending, awaiting Mike's go-ahead". > When this patch was originally submitted, bugs were discovered in the hugetlb_vmdelete_list routine. So, the patch "Fix bugs in hugetlb_vmtruncate_list" was created. I have retested the changes in this patch specifically dealing with page fault/hole punch race on top of the new hugetlb_vmtruncate_list routine. Everything looks good. How would you like to proceed with the patch? - Should I create a series with the hugetlb_vmtruncate_list split out? - Should I respin with hugetlb_vmtruncate_list patch applied? Just let me know what is easiest/best for you. -- Mike Kravetz -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>