On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Andrea Righi wrote: > mmh... looking at the code it seems the same behaviour, but in > Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt we say a different thing (i.e., for > dirty_bytes): > > "If dirty_bytes is written, dirty_ratio becomes a function of its value > (dirty_bytes / the amount of dirtyable system memory)." > > However, in dirty_bytes_handler()/dirty_ratio_handler() we actually set > the counterpart value as 0. > > I think we should clarify the documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@xxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for cc'ing me on this, Andrea. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>