Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > 1. Fix the ACPI information to indicate lower memory access differences > (was that info actually acurate?) so that zone reclaim defaults to off. The reason the ACPI information is set this way is that the people who tune the BIOS have some workload they care about which prefers zone reclaim off and they know they can force this "faster setting" by faking the distances. Basically they're working around a Linux performance quirk. Really I think some variant of Motohiro-san's patch is the right solution: most problems with zone reclaim are related to IO intensive workloads and it never made sense to have the unmapped disk cache local on a system with reasonably small NUMA factor. The only problem is on extremly big NUMA systems where remote nodes are so slow that it's too slow even for read() and write(). I have been playing with the idea of adding a new "nearby interleave" NUMA mode for this, but didn't have time to implement it so far. For application I don't think we can ever solve it completely, this probably always needs some kind of tuning. Currently the NUMA policy APIs are not too good for this because they are too static, e.g. in some cases "nearby" without fixed node affinity would also help here. -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>