Re: [Slub cleanup5 1/3] slub: reduce differences between SMP and NUMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Reduce the #ifdefs and simplify bootstrap by making SMP and NUMA as much alike
> > as possible. This means that there will be an additional indirection to get to
> > the kmem_cache_node field under SMP.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I'm slightly confused. What does SMP have to do with this? Isn't this
> simply NUMA vs UMA thing regardless whether its UP or SMP?

Right. But then UMA / UP is a rare config that I have only ever seen
working on IA64.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]