Re: zone state overhead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 08:40:15AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
> > Which of these is better or is there an alternative suggestion on how
> > this livelock can be avoided?
> 
> We need to run some experiments to see what is worse. Lets start by
> cutting both the stats threshold and the drift thing in half?
> 

Ok, I have no problem with that although again, I'm really not in the position
to roll patches for it right now. I don't want to get side-tracked.

> > As a heads up, I'm preparing for exams at the moment and while I'm online, I'm
> > not in the position to prototype patches and test them at the moment but can
> > review alternative proposals if people have them. I'm also out early next week.
> 
> Exams? You are finally graduating?
> 

Depends on how they go :)

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]