Re: [PATCH 1/4] oom: remove totalpage normalization from oom_badness()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> > Current oom_score_adj is completely broken because It is strongly bound
> > google usecase and ignore other all.
> > 
> 
> We've talked about this issue three times already.  The last two times 
> you've sent a revert patch, you failed to followup on the threads:
> 
> 	http://marc.info/?t=128272938200002
> 	http://marc.info/?t=128324705200002
> 
> And now you've gone above Andrew, who is the maintainer of this code, and 
> straight to Linus.  Between that and your failure to respond to my answers 
> to your questions, I'm really stunned at how unprofessional you've handled 
> this.

Selfish must die. you failed to persuade to me. and I havgen't get anyone's objection.
Then, I don't care your ugly whining.



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]