Re: [PATCH 5/5] writeback: Reporting dirty thresholds in /proc/vmstat

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 22:58:13 -0700
Michael Rubin <mrubin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The kernel already exposes the user desired thresholds in /proc/sys/vm
> with dirty_background_ratio and background_ratio. But the kernel may
> alter the number requested without giving the user any indication that
> is the case.
> 
> Knowing the actual ratios the kernel is honoring can help app developers
> understand how their buffered IO will be sent to the disk.
> 
>         $ grep threshold /proc/vmstat
>         nr_dirty_threshold 409111
>         nr_dirty_background_threshold 818223
> 

Yes, I think /proc/vmstat is a decent place to put these.  The needed
infrastructural support is minimal and although these numbers are
closely tied to the implementation-of-the-day, people should expect
individual fields in /proc/vmstat to appear and disappear at random as
kernel versions change.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]