Re: [PATCH 13/14] mm: mempolicy: Check return code of check_range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 02:02 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> > > From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Function check_range may return ERR_PTR(...). Check for it.
> > 
> > When happen this issue?
> > 
> > afaik, check_range return error when following condition.
> >  1) mm->mmap->vm_start argument is incorrect
> >  2) don't have neigher MPOL_MF_STATS, MPOL_MF_MOVE and MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
> > 
> > I think both case is not happen in real. Am I overlooking anything?
> > 
> 
> There's no reason not to check the return value of a function when the 
> implementation of either could change at any time.  migrate_to_node() is 
> certainly not in any fastpath where we can't sacrifice a branch for more 
> robust code.

Agreed, if you know that the caller must check input data and must not
check return code, it's better to make this function return void.

-- 
Vasiliy

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]