2010/9/4 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:57:13 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, the 3rd patch for this set.
>
> What happened with "[PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more
> conformable with offlining code"? You mentioned sending an updated
> one, but I can't immediately find it.
>
Sorry, I couldn't. (and I will not able to do until Monday.)
> Also, please do describe the impact of the problems which are being
> fixed. It helps me decide on priority and on
> which-kernels-need-the-patch and it helps others when deciding
> should-i-backport-this-into-my-kernel.
>
Ah,yes
- Before the patch [2/2], the code is buggy but works.
(Because of not-precise test of pre-memory-hotplug.)
IOW, patch [2/2] is not buggy but make the bug be apparent and
evenryone will hit this.
Influence is very small and maybe no need for backport.
> I think it'd be best to resend all of this, please.
>
I'll do in the next week. Sorry for annoying.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href