Re: [PATCH 04/10] hugetlb: hugepage migration core

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:

> diff --git v2.6.36-rc2/mm/vmscan.c v2.6.36-rc2/mm/vmscan.c
> index c391c32..69ce2a3 100644
> --- v2.6.36-rc2/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ v2.6.36-rc2/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
>  #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
>  #include <linux/delayacct.h>
>  #include <linux/sysctl.h>
> +#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
>
>  #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>  #include <asm/div64.h>
> @@ -508,6 +509,10 @@ void putback_lru_page(struct page *page)
>
>  	VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page));
>
> +	if (PageHuge(page)) {
> +		put_page(page);
> +		return;
> +	}
>  redo:
>  	ClearPageUnevictable(page);
>
> @@ -1112,7 +1117,9 @@ int isolate_lru_page(struct page *page)
>  {
>  	int ret = -EBUSY;
>
> -	if (PageLRU(page)) {
> +	if (PageHuge(page) && get_page_unless_zero(compound_head(page)))
> +		ret = 0;
> +	else if (PageLRU(page)) {
>  		struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
>
>  		spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
>

Huge pages are not on the LRU right? So why use the lru functions for
them and then not use the lru? Its a bit stranger. The caller must aware
of the different handling of huge pages since there is no toying around
with the lru. So just have the caller do a put or get page instead.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]