[patch -mm 1/2] oom: protect oom_disable_count with task_lock in fork

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



task_lock(p) protects p->mm->oom_disable_count such that it accurately 
represents the number of threads attached to that mm that cannot be
killed by the oom killer.  p->signal->oom_score_adj is never changed
without holding the lock.

This was missed in the fork() path, so we take the lock to ensure
checking its oom_score_adj and decrementing oom_disable_count don't race.

Reported-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/fork.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1304,8 +1304,10 @@ bad_fork_cleanup_namespaces:
 	exit_task_namespaces(p);
 bad_fork_cleanup_mm:
 	if (p->mm) {
+		task_lock(p);
 		if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
 			atomic_dec(&p->mm->oom_disable_count);
+		task_unlock(p);
 		mmput(p->mm);
 	}
 bad_fork_cleanup_signal:

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]